The authors of a subject of attenti...

The authors of a subject of attention published recently in the British Medical Journal rest that conclusions in clinical trials supplyed by for-profit organizations are more likely to favor experimental intervention than trials capitaled by nonprofit organizations. (1)
Because the BMJ requires authors to declare funding and competing interests, the researchers used 159 trials published on the journal between 1997 and 2001 as the basis for their consideration
Researchers Lise L Kjaergard and Bodil Als-Nielsen defined author conclusions as "the interpretation of stretch to which overall